|
Author
|
Topic: Resort Occupancy Discrepencies
|
jeffmelpsl
TUG MemberPosts: 393
From: Port St Lucie, Florida own: cape winds,cape cod, beach house golf/ raquetball,myrtle beach, sudwala lodge, and foxrun
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 04-14-2003 05:05
   
I have a question regarding the fairness of occupancy limits. I own at Cape Winds (CWR) and is a 4/2 occupancy. It is shown through II as sleeps 2. I could live with that if all units were based on private occuapncy. My unit is the 2 story townhouse type unit.I then am searching through exchanges and noticed the following: Marriott's Manor Club Sequel • MSE
Williamsburg Plantation • WPN
Club Sunterra @ Powhatan Plantation • PWP
Sunterra @ Greensprings Plantation • GSS There units are based on NON Private occupancy. There are also efficiencies that sleep 4?? How can this be as an efficiency is classified as a 1 room unit with bathroom.?? I would have a problem with my unit and I don't feel that my unit is being treated fairly based on just a search of Williamsburg. Why are some units based on non private and some private. I don't feel that a sleep sofa that who has to use another bedroom's bathroom equates to privacy. If that is the case then my 2 story unit actually would give you more privacy as each couple would sleep on 2 different floors sharing the same bathroom. Thanks
mel
PS I am having fun with II searches and am not at all dissatisfied. I would at some point use II for all exchanges and at this point can not nor will use this resort with II as it downgrades my unit. IP: Logged |
CraigU
TUG MemberPosts: 2331
From: Miami, Florida USA
Registered: Jun 2002
|
posted 04-14-2003 10:47
Please check the older threads as we have discussed this at length. quote:
Originally posted by jeffmelpsl:
I have a question regarding the fairness of occupancy limits. I own at Cape Winds (CWR) and is a 4/2 occupancy. It is shown through II as sleeps 2. I could live with that if all units were based on private occuapncy. My unit is the 2 story townhouse type unit.I then am searching through exchanges and noticed the following: Marriott's Manor Club Sequel • MSE
Williamsburg Plantation • WPN
Club Sunterra @ Powhatan Plantation • PWP
Sunterra @ Greensprings Plantation • GSS There units are based on NON Private occupancy. There are also efficiencies that sleep 4?? How can this be as an efficiency is classified as a 1 room unit with bathroom.?? I would have a problem with my unit and I don't feel that my unit is being treated fairly based on just a search of Williamsburg. Why are some units based on non private and some private. I don't feel that a sleep sofa that who has to use another bedroom's bathroom equates to privacy. If that is the case then my 2 story unit actually would give you more privacy as each couple would sleep on 2 different floors sharing the same bathroom. Thanks
mel
PS I am having fun with II searches and am not at all dissatisfied. I would at some point use II for all exchanges and at this point can not nor will use this resort with II as it downgrades my unit.
------------------
Craig Urbine
Vice President
Member Services
Interval International IP: Logged |
jeffmelpsl
TUG MemberPosts: 393
From: Port St Lucie, Florida own: cape winds,cape cod, beach house golf/ raquetball,myrtle beach, sudwala lodge, and foxrun
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 04-14-2003 21:34
Whether you discussed it at legnth it is very unfair: which is one of the reasons has RCI has an adavantage. Hope one day it will be less of an advantage which will want me deposit 2 weeks with II (which is prime location) and has a bonus weeks which is offerered but not worth the trade. Instead of a bonus weeks give, the unit its" worth.JMHO Mel IP: Logged |
CraigU
TUG MemberPosts: 2331
From: Miami, Florida USA
Registered: Jun 2002
|
posted 04-15-2003 04:52
You shouldn't jump to conclusions; part of the discussion was a change was coming soon. quote:
Originally posted by jeffmelpsl:
Whether you discussed it at legnth it is very unfair: which is one of the reasons has RCI has an adavantage. Hope one day it will be less of an advantage which will want me deposit 2 weeks with II (which is prime location) and has a bonus weeks which is offerered but not worth the trade. Instead of a bonus weeks give, the unit its" worth.JMHO Mel
------------------
Craig Urbine
Vice President
Member Services
Interval International IP: Logged |
jeffmelpsl
TUG MemberPosts: 393
From: Port St Lucie, Florida own: cape winds,cape cod, beach house golf/ raquetball,myrtle beach, sudwala lodge, and foxrun
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 04-15-2003 07:02
That is true Craig and I apologize. Yesterday was a bad day and should not of taken it out on you. I have been researching old threads. The issue with me is not necessarily so much on the searching but unit value. It seems to me illogical that a 1 br can only sleep 2 and an efficiency can sleep 4 if it is based on privacy. I guess that is my main question here. Mel IP: Logged |
CraigU
TUG MemberPosts: 2331
From: Miami, Florida USA
Registered: Jun 2002
|
posted 04-15-2003 15:42
Search results reflect the maximum sleeping capacity; not the private capacity. In most cases, the private capacity dictates the number of people who can be listed on a vacation request. I do not think there is any inconsistency in the examples described. I believe you are looking at two different things as outlined above. quote:
Originally posted by jeffmelpsl:
That is true Craig and I apologize. Yesterday was a bad day and should not of taken it out on you. I have been researching old threads. The issue with me is not necessarily so much on the searching but unit value. It seems to me illogical that a 1 br can only sleep 2 and an efficiency can sleep 4 if it is based on privacy. I guess that is my main question here. Mel
------------------
Craig Urbine
Vice President
Member Services
Interval International IP: Logged |
Timeshare Users Group Bulletin Boards
